United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Delegate Payment Deadline: April 19th!
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Table of Contents
Member States
The following Member States are represented in this session:
United States of America
Russian Federation
People’s Republic of China
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
French Republic
Republic of Sudan
Republic of South Sudan
Republic of Chad
Republic of Uganda
Central African Republic
Republic of Kenya
Federal Republic of Ethiopia
Republic of South Africa
Arab Republic of Egypt
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
State of Qatar
Federative Republic of Brazil
Federal Republic of Germany
Republic of India
United Arab Emirates
Topic Introduction
Addressing the Ongoing Genocide in Sudan: Accountability, Protection, and the Responsibility to Protect
The UNHRC convenes at a critical moment in Sudan’s history. What began in April 2023 as conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has escalated into widespread atrocities now characterized by many as genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.
Sudan currently represents the world’s largest displacement crisis, with over 10 million displaced and more than 1.8 million refugees in neighboring states.
“We are on the verge of losing an entire generation of Sudanese children to starvation, violence, and displacement.”
— Volker Türk, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (2024)
Historical Context: Why Dalfur Bleeds again
The roots of the current crisis lie in the Darfur genocide (2003–2010), during which approximately 300,000 people were killed and 2.5 million displaced.
Despite the indictment of former President Omar al-Bashir by the International Criminal Court (ICC), justice was never enforced. The RSF, emerging from the Janjaweed militias, continues similar patterns of violence today.
The Active Zone: 2023-2024 Atrocities
Siege of El Fasher (2024)
Over 10,000 civilians killed in El Geneina
Systematic ethnic targeting (Masalit community)
Widespread sexual violence
Famine declared in Zamzam Camp (IPC Phase 5)
25 million facing food insecurity
Aid obstruction used as a military tactic
ICC enforcement remains weak
Security Council gridlock (veto powers)
AU ceasefires repeatedly violated
Strategic Pillars
A three-pillar doctrine emphasizing:
State responsibility
International assistance
Collective action when states fail
Sudan represents a Pillar III crisis, yet action remains politically contested.
Frameworks include:
Geneva Conventions
Rome Statute
The issue is not lack of law — but lack of enforcement.
Aid obstruction is widespread and may constitute a war crime.
Safe zones and corridors remain controversial due to enforcement challenges.
Options include:
ICC referral
Hybrid tribunals
Truth commissions
Reparations frameworks
Important Definitions
Genocide
Acts intended to destroy a protected group (1948 Convention).
Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
Global commitment to prevent mass atrocities.
Crimes Against Humanity
Widespread/systematic attacks on civilians.
Ethnic Cleansing
Forced removal of populations (not a standalone legal term).
Rapid Support Forces (RSF)
Sudanese paramilitary group linked to Janjaweed.
Universal Periodic Review (UPR)
UNHRC review mechanism.
Humanitarian Corridor
Safe route for aid delivery.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL)
Laws governing armed conflict.
Famine (IPC Phase 5)
Extreme food insecurity classification.
Rome Statute
Treaty establishing the ICC.
Internally Displaced Person (IDP)
Person displaced within their own country.
Country Positions Overview
Delegates must research their assigned country beyond this guide.
United States – Supports R2P, ICC, sanctions
China – Non-intervention, economic interests
Russia – Sovereignty-focused, anti-intervention
United Kingdom – Strong humanitarian stance
Sudan – Denies genocide characterization
Chad – Major refugee host
UAE – Controversial involvement
(Full positions should be researched independently)
Questions to Consider
Does current evidence meet the legal threshold for genocide?
Should “Uniting for Peace” bypass Security Council paralysis?
How to balance peace vs. accountability?
How to enforce humanitarian access?
How to share refugee burden globally?
How to regulate arms transfers?
How to protect women and children?
How to break cycles of impunity?
Awards Criteria
Delegates will be evaluated based on:
Depth of research
Public speaking ability
Diplomacy and professionalism
Negotiation skills
Accurate country representation
Adherence to rules
Participation
Timely submission of position papers
⚠ Important Notice:
Use of AI for position papers is strictly prohibited and will result in disqualification.
Final Remarks and References
Position papers are not mandatory but are required for award consideration. They must reflect accurate country policy and present viable solutions.
This topic demands serious engagement — superficial preparation will not suffice.
“The world has never turned away from Sudan without consequence.”
UNHRC Sudan Page
UN OCHA Sudan
ICC Darfur Case
Genocide Convention (1948)
World Food Programme
Global Centre for R2P
Human Rights Watch
Amnesty International
UNHCR Sudan Emergency
UN Fact-Finding Mission on Sudan
Best of luck to all delegates.
Chair: Munkh-Orgil Enkhtugs
Co-Chair: Enkh-Uchral Gantsetseg